2010 Oil Spill: MMS/BOEMRE and NEPA. Updated August 19. 2010.
(29/05/2013)
On April 20, 2010, an exploratory oil well in the Gulf of Mexico exploded, killing 11 people and causing the worst oil spill in American history. The oil well was on a tract leased by BP, having obtained a lease and the relevant permits from the federal government. Under relevant federal law, federal actions that may have adverse environmental effects are required to be reviewed for potential environmental harm under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This report will review those environmental procedures. While there are additional environmental obligations imposed on Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) drilling by other acts, this...
Tác giả: Alexander, K. |
Số trang: 31 |
Lĩnh vực: Môi trường |
Năm XB: 2010 |
Loại tài liệu: Khác
Tài liệu cần xác thực trước khi tải
Tiêu đề | Tải về |
2010 Oil Spill: MMS/BOEMRE and NEPA. Updated August 19. 2010. | Số trang: 31
| Loại file:
On April 20, 2010, an exploratory oil well in the Gulf of Mexico exploded, killing 11 people and causing the worst oil spill in American history. The oil well was on a tract leased by BP, having obtained a lease and the relevant permits from the federal government. Under relevant federal law, federal actions that may have adverse environmental effects are required to be reviewed for potential environmental harm under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This report will review those environmental procedures. While there are additional environmental obligations imposed on Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) drilling by other acts, this report will not review those requirements. Multiple environmental reviews were conducted by the Minerals Management Service (MMS) at each stage of OCS development. (MMS was reorganized in May 2010, and the relevant office for the environmental reviews is the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement (BOEMRE). This report will refer to MMS for actions before the reorganization and BOEMRE going forward.) For the particular well in question, MMS addressed the environmental impacts on four occasions, including two full environmental impact statements, an environmental assessment, and a categorical exclusion. The fact that MMS categorically excluded the exploration plan from a NEPA analysis is controversial, since that is the first step in which drilling would be conducted. It appears MMS followed its internal procedure for NEPA reviews in the western and central areas of the Gulf of Mexico by employing a categorical exclusion for an exploration plan. However, that procedure has never been reviewed by a court to see if it is consistent with the law or whether an exception to the categorical exclusion may apply in this ca
|
miễn phí
|
© Copyright 2012 Trung tâm Thông tin Khoa học và Công nghệ - Sở Khoa học & Công nghệ TP. Cần Thơ
Địa chỉ: 118/3 Trần Phú - P.Cái Khế - Q.Ninh Kiều - TPCT
Điện thoại: 0292 3824031 Fax: 0292 3812352
|
|
Lượt truy cập:
(Website trong thời gian thử nghiệm)